Diversity Is Mediocrity

By PaxCanadiana

We don’t need a self-promoting blowhard telling us how mediocre (Prime Minister) Justin Trudeau’s cabinet is.  I think it does a pretty good job of speaking for itself.

When you have a former ski instructor and substitute drama teacher of generational wealth possessing an undeserved sense of self-importance acting as the effective “leader” of your country what can you expect?

We’re not talking Winston Churchill here.  More like Kim Jong Un minus all that evil stuff.  However, it’s worth noting his reason for saying it which is to pursue diversity for diversity sake, you sacrifice competency and inevitably quality, producing an inferior outcome to what you could have had.  When diversity is your maxim you’re practically capitulating to being second best almost all the time.  In fact, “diversity means second (or even last) place” is truer to reality than “diversity is our strength” which is more at home in ideological fantasy-land.

And I could stop there because I think it’s so self-evident that diversity is mediocrity that elaboration is not needed.  I guess I could provide some examples.

New York state is planning on scrapping a literacy test it used to screen teachers because too many minorities — primarily blacks and Hispanics — were failing it.  This means the standards of the New York state education system will suffer as will the education of the pupils forced to be taught by unqualified teachers.  All for the sake of diversity.

Journalistic standards have been further diminished by the diversity agenda.  Ever cognizant of the effect their words may have on the minds of the reading public journalists have engaged in self-censorship and spin when reporting the news.  Objectivity and truth have given way to misinformation, half-truths, or just spiking a story if it doesn’t conform to the “diversity is our strength” narrative.  This has created a demoralized journalistic class and the misleading of the public by contributing to its collective ignorance.

Diversity is such a strength for Canadian society unemployment is one its great gifts to the host white majority.

Ottawa policing standards were given a brief relief of duty to hire an unqualified Somali immigrant.

[…]

Are we talking about racial diversity?  How is that our strength?  How does one’s particular skin colour endow that person with unique skills and talents that that can’t be replicated by others of a different racial composition?  How does one’s skin colour bestow gifts unto the society they happen to inhabit?  If we’re honest with ourselves, we can see that racial diversity is not our strength.  It’s pursued more as a moral obligation if anything, while ignoring all of the undesirable social problems it creates.  Indeed, racial diversity is bullshit!

>>> con’t to FULL REPORT.

Oh, Canada – Where To From Here?

By Avatar

There are legitimate questions on whether immigration levels are adversely affecting housing affordability, or demand on infrastructure, or cost to tax payers, or the job market.

It should be questioned whether our immigration policy promotes terrorism, or criminality or barbaric cultural practices. All these issues are pretty much economic, or law and order issues.

The West has adopted systems of liberalism, universalism, and egalitarianism. The West has become very successful under the culture, and law, of anti-corruption, and anti-nepotism. As an extension of this, Westerners no longer practice in-group preference.

Minority groups, largely made up of new immigrants, are energized by immigration policy in a way that is not true for the rest of Canadians. Minority groups still have a culture of preferring their own groups, as they have not assimilated into Western culture. If there is no economic or law and order benefits to immigration, then I would say the vast majority of Canadians would have no problem ending most immigration to Canada. But this is not true for minority groups. They support immigration based solely on identity reasons.

The Liberals have been playing dog whistle identity politics with minority groups. The Liberals signal to minority groups, that they will be able to continue to grow their communities through immigration. When Trudeau says Canada is the “first postnational state”, he is actually saying that he will continue to shame and ignore established Canadians if they reject the government’s immigration policy. When Trudeau talks about equality, he actually means the exact opposite, minority groups will be allowed to play identity politics and have in-group preference, while the majority of Canadians (Europeans) will not. When Liberals say that their driving motive for immigration is economic, they lie. Liberals have successfully manipulated the political culture so that they may serve minority identity politics while successfully blocking legitimate pushback from the majority of Canadians.

It is hard for Conservatives to energize a base of supporters when they are using the same language that the Liberals do. The word equality is an empty word. It has come to mean status-quo politics of division and inequality. The Western culture that the Liberals draw off of, is not immune to critical examination though. It is possible to call out the Liberals for what they are doing.

Conservatives haven’t had anything to do with identity politics for decades. It is the Liberals that have created a climate of divisive politics, not us. They treat different Canadian groups differently, while we treat everyone the same. We must call out the Liberals for pushing minority identity politics so far that it begs a reaction (Century Initiative!)

The political system cannot play favourites, all Canadians must have equal say about immigration policy. The political climate must no longer cater to minority identity politics while the majority of Canadians are ignored. If it is true that we must grow the Canadian population, immigration is not the only answer. We can promote Canadian families by allowing them affordable housing, low tax burden, jobs, safety and security. In this way we can increase our birthrate if necessary. The status-quo of Liberal corruption and gridlocking meaningful immigration reform must end. A conservative, nationalistic, Canadian-first government would do us a lot of good. This is the positive goal to strive for.

Some other complementary ideas I can think of are:

Privatizing the CBC, the tax payer funded Liberal government propaganda wing.

Ending affirmative action; discriminating in favour of one group means discriminating against another group, which is clearly a bad thing. Pro-diversity just means anti-White.

-Equality of tax burden for men and women. Equal treatment in family courts. Social justice wealth redistribution is not the governments’ business. Dispossessing men of their utility is damaging to families. Feminism only exists under the condition of being paid for by men.

-Obviously we care about the plight of all people of the world. Open borders globalism is not the answer though. A nation state is uniquely capable of practicing sovereignty over itself, in order to fix it’s own problems. The best way for us to help others is by supporting self-sustaining nation states. The freedom to fail is how we approach perfection. Difficulty creates strength. Welfare creates weakness.

-Generally diminishing the size of the state and lowering taxes.

-Despite the state wanting Canada to be post-national, Canada is still largely a nation of Europeans. The state should serve our nation. No more massimmigration. No more White-Genocide. This is how all other non-European states of the world operate. Minority groups clearly still have in-group preference and if these minority groups get large enough they will naturally want a state of their own to serve their own. So for example, if British Columbia became 90% Chinese, this province would likely just separate to form their own nation state. Nothing about hate, this is more just factual real life. I mean the French and English are still at each others necks after hundreds of years, so how would you expect other groups to integrate any better?  >Source

Also read:

Is Burlington TOO White?

Race Diversity – But Why?

White Males Under Attack

*****

Black Foreigner NOT Happy in Canada

Canada’s Naive Prime Minister

From Immigration Watch Canada

“Post National” Trudeau is now being criticized for breaking the MP Code of Ethics. The criticism is based on the fact that he accepted a vacation stay and a helicopter trip from the Aga Khan who is the spiritual leader and lobbyist for the world’s Ismaili Muslim sect. Justin Trudeau

The key point is that the things for which Trudeau is being criticized are trivial when placed beside the much more serious sins he has committed . Here is a list of those sins :

(1) He approved a treasonous 300,000 immigrant intake in 2016, In addition, he has approved a 300,000 immigrant-intake for for 2017. We use the word  “treasonous”  because Canada has over one million unemployed.

A Prime Minister’s key role is is to protect the job prospects of Canadians, yet Trudeau foolishly plays the role of Philosopher-King and says things like ‘Canada is a post-national state’.

In doing this, he has implied that the needs of Canadians are far less important than the needs of immigrants. If he wants to imitate his father who did play the Philosopher King role, he should dramatically cut immigration as his father did in the early 1980’s. His father, by the way, was the last Canadian Prime Minister to cut immigration in order to protect jobless Canadians.

Trudeau is surrounded by the like-minded. Not a single member of Canada’s House of Commons has challenged the federal government’s post-1991 immigration intake. All are guilty of gross negligence. In fact, Canada’s House of Commons could be more appropriately called Canada’s House of Cowards and Quislings because its actions have been cowardly and treasonous to its citizens. As a result, Canada’s large number of unemployed have been been languishing on the employment sidelines for years. Bringing in 600,000 immigrants in two years is going to cause unnecessary further competition for a limited number of jobs and more languishing and unnecessary hardship for Canada’s unemployed.  “Post National” boasts that he wants to enlarge Canada’s middle class. However, his actions regarding Canada’s unnecessary immigration intake will further destroy the country’s middle class.

(2) A significant number of Canada’s current population are Muslim immigrants who support the Muslim Brotherhood which has declared in a widely-publicized Memorandum that its purpose in settling in North America is to infiltrate our society, and destroy it from within.  Let’s quote from that Memorandum :

“The process of (Muslim Brotherhood) settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process,’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in (North America is kind of a grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house…The Aga Khan is a prominent supporter of the sinister Muslim Brotherhood.

Trudeau should not be even associating with the Aga Khan, let alone staying under his roof.  >>more “sins” HERE.

3rd World Countries, Here WE Become!

 

On today’s show Frosty Wooldridge returned for a new series entitled,

America, Canada, And Western Countries Becoming The Third World’s Refugee Camps.”

Did you know as of 2014, 41.3 million foreign-born immigrants call America home. They arrived from 140 war-torn or starvation-prone countries around the world. They reached our shores from failed cultures, failed educational systems, failed economic systems, and/or horrendously overpopulated countries around the globe.

They fled or flee countries like India, China, Somalia, Mexico, Bangladesh, Congo, Ethiopia, Honduras, El Salvador, Brazil, Argentina, Indochina and Pakistan along with another 140 countries.  As they make their way to America, Canada, and Western Countries, they in turn make those host countries the Third World’s Refugee Camps.

Click Here To Listen To The Show

Click Here For Frosty’s Website

Click Here For The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show Archive Where You Can Listen To Or Download All My Shows

Muslim Murder Mayhem in Paris

By Vanishing American II

[…]

So Moslems are allowed, …no, encouraged, …no, welcomed to come and live amongst us … and if we have an objection to that, we are not allowed to freely express those objections.

In some Western countries it is now a crime to criticize immigration and though it is not yet criminal here (U.S.), it can’t be spoken in ‘respectable‘ circles without being drowned with cries of ‘racism’, ‘hate’, and ‘xenophobia.’

So, we are unwillingly being made targets of those Moslems who act as surrogates for the others in attacking critics of the Moslem founder Mohammed, as with the leftist journalists and cartoonists who were the targets of the attacks in Paris. And this is with the tacit approval of our ”leaders”, who invariably mouth appeasing statements toward the ”islamic community” and pleas for ‘tolerance’ on the part of the native population. Then comes the inevitable wave of articles sympathetically reporting that there is a ‘fear of a backlash against innocent Muslims’, fear of ‘hate crimes’ from the general population. Never mind that there has never been a significant backlash on the part of the majority after any of the numerous ‘isolated incidents’ of Moslems killing non-Moslems.

[…]

But in all Western countries, the politically correct indoctrination is so deeply, and firmly entrenched, even among the more traditional segments of society, that there are more people who, (perhaps led by the PC media) rush to show their sympathy for their ‘moderate Moslem‘ neighbors, or co-workers, or that nice man who owns the convenience store. Lefties are out in full force decrying ‘hate’ and asking why can’t we all just love each other and be a ‘welcoming and inclusive society‘.

Will this event, then, break the conditioning and pave the way for the natural and healthy response to such attacks — the instinct to show solidarity with one’s own, one’s home and family, one’s neighbors? Self-defense and the instinct to survive as a people — those are natural and healthy responses. People without them don’t last. Now we’ve had it beaten into our heads by media, by ‘government leaders‘, and by the schools, that it’s bad to care for our own: our kin and kind, our heritage, our way of life. Our territory; ‘land where my fathers died,’ … as we used to sing in our schoolrooms.

…read FULL report HERE.

“Soft” Totalitarian State of Canada

By Tim Murray

Multiculturalism is Canada’s Ingsoc (Orwellian term). The ideology of a “soft” totalitarian state. A state that does not need gulags, detention camps, or torture chambers to achieve its goals because the ruling political-class can “manufacture consent” through its control of the media, the universities, and government departments.

To use Marxist terminology, the political class— the ruling class–does not need to control the “infrastructure”, it only needs to control the “superstructure”. It is far more important — for their purposes — to control the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) than it would be to control any major corporation listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

[We Have Been Duped]

The most effective way to promote this ideology of “Diversity and Tolerance” and Cultural relativism (Marxism) is to shape the language, to supplant “Oldspeak” with “Newspeak”, to replace accurate descriptions with euphemisms, to make it impossible for younger generations to think subversive thoughts by putting them in a verbal straight-jacket. The point is not simply to deny them the words they would need to express critical thoughts, but through the loss of these words to deny them the ability to form critical thoughts.

Is this not what has been happening step by step in the last forty years, picking up speed as time by passes by? Dumbing young people down by displacing plain standard English with PC jargon? Displacing critical thinking with ideologically programmed responses? Is this not what Canadian universities do now? Is that not their mission? The goal of a liberal arts “education”? Are Canadian universities not just boot-camps of political correctness, factories to churn out soldiers for Multicult Group-Think? Soldiers who one day will occupy the newsrooms, cabinet rooms, staff rooms and board rooms of the nation?

Long ago an American military officer concluded that in order to complete the conquest, displacement and assimilation of Native Americans, “We must kill the Indian in the child”. In other words, for any colonial agenda the final solution to the native “problem” must involve the eradication of native culture—and that culture is best transmitted through its language. It’s a habitual strategy. English occupiers tried to do that in Wales and Ireland, and the Department of Indian Affairs tried to that in Residential Schools here [in Canada]. Now we are doing it to ourselves in our universities. Or rather, they are doing it to us.

Who are “they”? They are not our colonial occupiers but their handmaidens … the Puppet Intelligentsia, the political class who are paving the way for our ongoing conquest by dressing it up as an opportunity to enjoy more “diversity”. Hence the invention of a language and a vocabulary which can frame the invasion in positive terms, and exclude alternative interpretations.

How ironic is it then, that by displacing Oldspeak with Multi-cult Newspeak, young Canadians are able to become reconciled to their own displacement. The political class is killing the Canadian in the child.   Source

[For added emphasis, all bolded words by Editor]