Dual Citizenship For Personal Convenience

By MARINA JIMÉNEZ  Globe and Mail

Some call the Canadian passport an $87 get-out-of-jail-free card. Others see it as emergency evacuation insurance. As Ottawa finally begins to review Canada’s citizenship policy — one of the most generous in the world — critics are calling for a special tax for overseas Canadians. “People want all the benefits of being Canadian, but none of the burden,” said Richard Kurland, a lawyer and immigration policy analyst. “Non-resident citizens should not have a free ride — business class — at taxpayers’ expense, by flashing a Canadian passport.”

Added Don DeVoretz, an economist at Vancouver’s Simon Fraser University: “The time has come to look at the citizenship policy and ask, does it serve Canada’s interests?”

This summer’s $94-million evacuation of 15,000 Lebanese-Canadians from war-torn Lebanon finally prompted Ottawa to announce a review of Canada’s citizenship policy. Immigration Minister Monte Solberg won’t divulge details about the review, but he has said it is time to review the obligations of citizens who live abroad while drawing on Canada’s social programs. Mr. Kurland advocates the introduction of a special new tax for non-resident citizens. Canadians who have been living overseas for more than five years should pay $500 for a passport, he said.

This idea has also been endorsed by John Chant, a retired Simon Fraser University economist, in a study titled the Passport Package, released this month by the C.D. Howe Institute. “The costs of the non-resident passport package should be shifted from resident Canadians who pay taxes to non-resident citizens who benefit but pay no taxes,” Prof. Chant said in an interview.

Such a tax would raise about $200-million a year, based on the estimate that 80 per cent of the 2.7 million overseas Canadians would choose to maintain their citizenship. The policy would be less cumbersome and bureaucratic than requiring Canadians living abroad to pay income taxes. “I have spoken to non-governmental organizations who work with South Asians, and they all think this is very fair,” Mr. Kurland said. “Call it the insurance passport.”

[…]

Canada’s current policy, designed to attract newcomers, allows immigrants to become citizens after just three years of residency — with no requirement to relinquish previous passports. Non-resident Canadians do not have to pay income tax. Babies born to tourists are also entitled to full citizenship. People can acquire citizenship through ancestry as well, qualifying if a parent was Canadian — even if this parent never lived in Canada.

This generous policy, meant to lure newcomers, has in many cases actually served to accelerate their departure. Today, an estimated 8 per cent of all Canadians (2.7 million) live outside the country, 1.7 million of them permanent residents elsewhere, according to the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. Forty-four per cent live in the United States; 24 per cent in Asia and 18 per cent in Europe. There are currently 300,000 [Chinese-born?] Canadians in Hong Kong alone. In his study, Prof. Chant notes that overseas Canadians have a range of government benefits that he calls the “passport package.”

The package includes not just one-time evacuations, but a whole list of benefits:

They pay resident tuition fees and receive university financial assistance;

Their dependents can become Canadian citizens;

They have health-care benefits;

They are eligible for the prisoner transfer program;

They receive consular services, free entrance into Canada and visa exemptions to travel to many other countries.

Mr. Kurland added that if there was political upheaval in Taiwan, Hong Kong or mainland China, the impact on Canada could be enormous in terms of evacuation and resettlement costs. “Those evacuated from Lebanon this summer were given return tickets and within two months, half had returned,” he pointed out. “It’s time they shared the cost of this.”

[…]

Prof. DeVoretz recently returned from Nashan, China, where he interviewed 500 Canadians of Chinese origin about why they decided to return to their country of origin. He discovered that most never intended to stay in Canada. “They just wanted the passports,” he said.

[…]

[That last statement sums up Canada’s dual passport fiasco with a basic language understood by any self-serving human being.]

ALSO READ:

Race Diversity – But WHY?

Frank Talk On Immigration

Immigration & Race

Non-Assimilating Immigrants

Multiculturalism – A Dividing Force

The RACISM Ploy

Racism – It’s Everywhere

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s