“Political-Correctness” — Short Explanation

By Theodore Dalrymple

Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same [intentional] effect.


Hate Laws Lead To Totalitarianism


By Fulton Huxtable

Statist, n. One who believes in the principle or policy of concentrating extensive economic, political and related controls in the state at the cost of individual liberty.

One of the hallmarks of a totalitarian society is the imprisonment of individuals for their ideas. Did you know that, in America, there are individuals serving prison time for their beliefs, for the ideas they hold? Don’t believe it? Read on.

In a free and just society, if you commit a crime, such as assault, you are punished for that act, not for the idea which motivated the act. If an ignorant racist assaults someone, he is treated no differently than a better person who commits the same crime. The punishment is the same for both individuals. Assault is assault and the motive does not alter the nature of the act. Motive explains the act, it does not excuse, mitigate or make it worse.

One of the most ominous, dangerous moves by statists has been the enactment of legislation regarding so-called hate crime. With hate crime, you are punished not only for the act of assault but also for the idea which led to the assault.

Here’s how hate crime works. If you commit assault, let’s say the normal penalty is five years in prison. Under hate-crime laws, if you commit the assault because of racist ideas, or other bad ideas, then your penalty is “enhanced” with extra years in prison–and those extra years in prison are not for the act of assault but for the ideas which prompted the assault.

Forget racism’s irrational and odious nature, focus only on the precedent established by hate-crime legislation: you are to be punished, imprisoned, for holding a certain idea. It makes no difference that, so far, those receiving extra prison time are actual criminals. The fact remains these individuals, as reprehensible as they are, are serving prison time for their ideas.

It is no accident that actual criminals have been chosen as the initial target of hate crime. By selecting criminals who commit heinous acts, statists have successfully hidden their agenda. It has enabled statists to smuggle into their legislation hate crime’s dangerous precedent, one which will gradually spread to areas other than real crime. It will be driven by an irresistible logic: if it is right for the state to criminalize one idea, it is right to criminalize any idea.

[e.g. author George Orwell’s booknineteen-eighty-four]

Consider the other precedent established by hate crime: that it is a crime to hate. In a free society, hatred is not a crime. Those consumed by irrational hatred are free to act upon that hatred. There is only one prohibition: do not initiate force against another.

Hatred is an intense dislike of something. Hatred, like love, may be rational or irrational. If you love freedom, you hate enslavement. The hatred of those things which may destroy your values is perfectly rational. Such hatred is good.

Since the defining characteristic of hate is the intensity of your dislike of something, the campaign by the haters of hate is really an attempt to destroy your capacity for a passionate belief in anything, rendering you impotent to oppose them. Create a nation of sheep, individuals incapable of loving or hating anything, a nation of docile, pliable people and you have the kind easily manipulated by statists.

With the precedent of jail time for bad ideas and hate as a crime, statists will move with a vengeance against their enemies–those who love their freedom. The use of “hate” will be selective. It may be a few years before journalists, writers–and you–are hauled off to jail for the crime of “hate,” but it is coming as long as the precedents of hate crime are accepted and codified in law.



Is Racial Diversity Good For Canada?

“All Whites Are Racist” – University

Racial Diversity – A CON Game


OSSTF Censures B’nai Brith and JDL

— Press Release —

The (Toronto) Executive of District 12 Secondary Teachers Bargaining Unit unanimously condemns B’nai Brith and the Jewish Defense League (JDL) for what it believes amounts to a bullying campaign launched against OSSTF and its members.

On January 12th, B’nai Brith launched an all-out assault on OSSTF by sending an e-mail “alert” to [their] members urging them to pressure OSSTF members to disengage from a debate scheduled to take place at this Thursday’s regular monthly Council Meeting. Today, the Jewish Defense League announced its intention to rally outside of the OSSTF office during the meeting.

“This can be seen as nothing short of an attempt to intimidate our membership” said Doug Jolliffe, President of OSSTF District 12 Toronto.

“What seems to be missing, as indicated by the actions of these two organizations, is an understanding, despite an explanation from me to B’nai Brith before this alert was released, that as a democratic organization, OSSTF must entertain debate on any motion duly moved and seconded, as long as it does not ask for support of an illegal action or an action which breaches our own Constitution, Policies or Bylaws” explained Jolliffe.

“The Executive can not quash debate, nor can the Executive control what items Members feel worthy of debate, nor as a democratic organization should we.”

Each month, OSSTF Toronto Teachers hold a Council Meeting the purpose of which is in part to consider motions. Unless passed by a majority vote, the motions belong only to the Mover and Seconder. Motions are brought forward for debate in order to ascertain whether the idea contained therein has broad enough acceptance and support among the Membership to become the Union’s official position by a majority vote. It is only through the support of a majority of its representative Council that a motion can be approved.

“The Executive understands the emotional response these kinds of ideas provokes. We have had to grapple with that ourselves as voting Members of this meeting, and certainly we know that our Membership is not a monolith when it comes to these motions, or in fact any other motion that might come before our Council for debate. However for an outside organization to encourage and engage in this kind of heavy-handed, intimidating action before a decision as to whether these motions are ones we can support, is absurd.”

“Make no mistake about it. Whether the motions are carried or defeated, it will be a reflection of the will of the majority of our Members, and that’s as it should be.”

Free Speech Stifled Again

Halifax goons manhandling Jared Taylor

By Micheal Lightstone – Chronicle Herald

A controversial American writer and speaker who publicizes views many Canadians find offensive was roughed up at a Halifax hotel Tuesday night after obscenity-spouting protesters prevented him from delivering a talk on race and integration.

Dozens of demonstrators—many of them young people hiding their faces behind balaclavas or bandanas—shouted down Jared Taylor inside a meeting room at the Lord Nelson Hotel. A couple of protesters shoved him into a hallway but were prevented from manhandling him further by an opponent who had come to hear what Mr. Taylor had to say. Prior to that incident, most of the demonstrators swore loudly at Mr. Taylor and told him to get out of town. At one point in the tense confrontation, several protesters surrounded him and tossed torn copies of pamphlets he had brought with him at his head. Others banged on noisemakers and hooted and hollered. “Leave! Leave! The message is clear!” anti-racist activists yelled at Mr. Taylor. “Get out! Get out! Exit the building!” they said.

The f-word was flying around the room as protesters tried to intimidate the man, who in turn mocked them about using “such charming language.” Dressed in a conservative business suit, white shirt and tie, Mr. Taylor for a while leaned on a lectern and smiled at the room full of rowdies. The demonstrators calmed down briefly, then got a second wind and peppered the event with more foul language.

“You can shout all you want,” Mr. Taylor told the crowd, “but the police will be here and they will maintain the peace.” Halifax Regional Police officers were in the hotel’s lobby after most protesters left the building, but it was hotel security that handled near-bedlam in the third-floor meeting room. Mr. Taylor, who had been scheduled to participate in a Dalhousie University debate Monday on racial diversity before university officials dropped him from the program, intended to speak on his own Tuesday.

The university’s event, which was going to be a lecture by David Devine, a black scholar at Dalhousie, was cancelled because of “inclement weather”. Editor of a publication called American Renaissance, Mr. Jared Taylor is a white, Yale-educated author and lecturer who maintains he is not a white supremacist.

[Inclement weather??  — On this blog, Dec. 31, 2006, it was reported  “Officials of the Halifax university cited — ‘the controversy surrounding the issue’ –  [was the] deciding [factor] to cancel the event which was to be held on Martin Luther King Jr. Day.]

But his opponents strongly dispute that, saying his writings and talks show his true colours. Media outlets were invited to attend Mr. Taylor’s talk at the Lord Nelson, which was also open to the general public. One attendee who was the man who intervened when Mr. Taylor was being roughly escorted into the hallway was Jon Goldberg of the Atlantic Jewish Council in Halifax. Mr. Goldberg acknowledged he’s familiar with Mr. Taylor’s views, which he finds abhorrent. He said the protesters were wrong to physically usher the speaker out of the meeting room.

Unfortunately, unless he breaks (Canada’s) hate-crime law, it’s a free country,” Mr. Goldberg told The Chronicle Herald. What Mr. Taylor has done is “incite these people to violence, which will make him a martyr,” Mr. Goldberg said. “The best thing you could have done was to ignore the guy,” he said.

[“Unfortunately,……………… it’s a free country”freudian slip?]

In an interview, Mr. Taylor said he has never received such a “disconcerting” reception in his life. He said he was outraged by the behaviour of most protesters at the meeting. “I kept expecting police officers to show up,” Mr. Taylor said. “So it was a surprise to me that that never happened.”


“Here’s a classic MSM article at work. Notice the adjective-laced descriptions of both Jared and his ideas whereas Mr. Devine is simply “a black scholar at Dalhousie.” The headline from the second article states Jared was supposedly “Chased” from the room insinuating a scene suggesting he literally ran for his life. Much is made of those who disagree with Jared and their rants are printed verbatim, however nothing of the sort is written about Devine. This is classic MSM propaganda. There is also a veiled threat to Jared about violating Canada’s “Hate Laws” which many of us have warned him about. Even though Jared’s views were incorrectly labeled as “Fascist” you can be sure that the REAL FASCISTS, including the ‘noble’ Mr. Goldberg who found it “unfortunate” that Jared was still free to exercise his speech rights, would dance a jig if Jared had been hauled away ‘legally’ by violating the completely FASCIST “hate laws” in Canada.

I’m not sure how meaningful it is to call Canada or any other western country “free” when you can lose your job, by ostracized socially, or be brownshirted for speaking your opinions without getting any assistance from the police. These days, “freedom” seems to be a favored power word and a justification for increasing the government’s police powers and engaging in disastrous adventures abroad, but little else.”

The same masked unwashed Bolsheviks performing the same stunts that seemingly run perpetually throughout history since the creation of communism.”

Mr.Taylor, those idiots are not representative of Nova Scotians. There are fascist, brainwashed thugs everywhere. Everyone I’ve talked to is disgusted with how you were treated.”

Multiculturalism–A Divisive Force


By Louis Beam

All multicultural nations will be found to be in a state of political, moral, economic and social decay. Greed and corruption will characterize the government, coupled with oppressive measures directed against [its’ own] citizens. Lies and deceit will be stock and trade of media, politicians, and educational institutions. Such are the leaders of sheep of a multiculturalist advent.

In modern times multiculturalism [or multi-racialism] is instituted from the top down as an elitist ruling class tool used to play one or more racial or ethnic groups against another. The ensuing cultural melee serves the political designs, economic goals and power needs of elitist rulers and their sponsors. This technique was developed by Marxist ideologues who used multiculturalism in Russia to divide and conquer resistance to the institution of a communist state. The end result of their successful takeover was the murder of thirty million humans in the Soviet Union alone.

The same internationalist cabals who sponsored Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin as the multicultural leaders of the Soviet state from their banking houses in New York, similarly sponsor the multicultural leaders of the United States, Canada, Europe, [Australia & New Zealand] today. An interlocking network of foundations such as Ford and Carnegie, international banking empires such as Rockefeller and Rothschild, and government agencies firmly held in their control, work in tandem with controlled propaganda outlets such as the New York Times, CBS… and Hollywood, to promote, foster, and institute multiculturalism today. While the examples used in this essay deal primarily with the United States the same process with the same methods is being employed elsewhere. This of itself is prima facie evidence of a cabal which promotes multiculturalism as a tool to achieve its [marxist] objectives.

Multiculturalism is being used as a hammer to forge the compliant people who will compose the obedient states of the New World Order. As a weapon of post modern political warfare, multiculturalism has few equals, which, thus explains its use currently against all of Western Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The deliberate fragmentation of these nations and the resultant loss of national identity and purpose into politically disharmonious units, serves as a stepping stone to world government. And who will compose that world government? A ruling class consisting of an “economic hierarchy” that replaces the philosophy of the nineteenth century “natural hierarchy.” A force that views countries and the people that live in them, first, as economic targets to be exploited, and second as military targets to be defeated, if they resist.

One must not let himself be confused by the window dressing of willing dupes from the [political] left who are most often, but not always, seen as the spokesmen for the ‘glories’ of multiculturalism. Liberal supporters of multiculturalism amount to nothing more than opportunist parasites riding on the back of a social fungus attacking the body politic. The real stimulus, unseen elitists who promote multiculturalism as a tool of warfare, are themselves anything but liberal, progressive, or democratic. Rather they are global social tyrants who seek more power, more wealth, and more control over people they seek to rule.

Elitists schemers envision a dictatorial world government composed of forcibly federated states, which, properly speaking, are police states without borders. The United Nations will serve as the store house front and public face of those who from behind the scenes manipulate world events. Economically envisioned is a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Stalin did for his miserable workers. Vassal states are to produce goods and insure compliance of their subjects by defining all opposition to the borderless police state as terrorism. Thus will be the good times. In bad times, when elitist multinational corporations are unable to maintain control, the armed might of NATO will be used to enforce obedience by non-compliant states.


Just as television commercials are run by those who will profit from their airing, multiculturalism is fostered [foisted?] upon a country by its sponsors who intend to benefit from its acceptance.

Those who sponsor multiculturalism are properly called multiculturalists and generally will be found to be those people with the least amount of personal culture appertaining to them. As a dying tree drops its leaves and is attacked by fungus and worms of decay, so to is a nation set upon by multiculturalists. The dominate [White] culture is attacked from all sides. This is not so much a product of maliciousness [but] ….as a necessity. By vilifying, leveling, and weakening the dominant [White] culture, an environment is created for social, political, and economic turmoil which produces change that will benefit the sponsors of a multiculturalist state. If the government and news media relentlessly pursue issues of race, gender, and diversity in preference to the real issues that need to be addressed, there will be an increasing division of society along the same lines. That is exactly what the sponsors of multiculturalism desire.

Social instability, caused by a steady erosion of standards and values, coupled with a scramble over dwindling economic opportunities by conflicting ethnic groups, produces precisely the alienation and conflict needed to implement a multicultural state. Further, the lack of common standards and values leads to personal disorganization, resulting in unsociable behavior. This is the life support system of a multicultural state. In a word: anomie (a social vacuum).

As a political tool multiculturalism has several applications. It is used to prevent a national consensus among the electorate. The confluence of divergent life views, cultures, beliefs, religions, ethnic habits, etc. insures a swirling river of discontent upon which the multiculturalist rides. It is a perfect method of ensuring that there can never in the future be accord, unity, and a common agreed-upon destiny among those ruled. Multiculturalism represents a basic form of divide and conquer, to the benefit of corrupt government and its sponsors.

Multiculturalism is likewise a financial tool used to socially and economically level a targeted population. When implemented, it becomes in fact a battle over scarce resources and shrinking economic opportunities, with government weighing in on the side of cheap labour. A continual flow of impoverished workers is insured through immigration (both legal and illegal), who by working for less compensation continually drive wages down. For the vast majority of citizens the standard of living will not increase, but rather constantly decrease.

As a general rule:

The amount of multiculturalism in any society is directly proportional to the corruption at the top of a political system and inversely proportional to national unity.
Multiculturalism will have succeeded in so much as the country has failed.

It can further be used as “transitional tool” to take a targeted population from one form of government to another. When a political condition of greed, massive corruption, and diversity of objective is coupled to a social condition of drugs, violence, and discontent, therein is the perfect environment for governmental change to a system that more closely serves long term interests of ruling elitists. Seeing that both the problem and solution are provided by the same people makes the CIA’s importation of some one hundred billion dollars worth of cocaine and other drugs into the United States understandable. While at the same time explaining FBI, ATF, and other, more secretive federal government agencies involvement in domestic terrorism or its cover-up. Suddenly, that which erroneously was previously thought to be unrelated events shows their common thread and purpose.

Within the deleterious milieu of multiculturalism, exists the propaganda opportunity for re-education of the people into a more malleable entity. A targeted population will be shaped mentally by new forms of public education in the schools, media indoctrination, and by elitist pronouncements. When placed in a crucible of economic necessity and social pressure, the once free-citizens become despondent masses, adjusting to and accepting fundamentally changing national circumstances as a matter of expedient survival.

For the reticent, conformity by force will ensue in the form of legal penalties disguised as anti-drug, anti-terrorism, or anti-hate laws. All of this leading toward what George Orwell so aptly predicted in his book 1984:

“Almost certainly we are moving into an age of totalitarian dictatorships. This will be an age in which freedom of thought will be at first a deadly sin and later on a meaningless abstraction.”

A society is being spawned where those with the most unsociable behavior, deviant lifestyle or personal failures, are given the most by government. (Note the Australian parliament is awash with homosexuals, all sorts of deviants and many are solicitors who are trained to be professional liars) This is no accident! It is not government blundering, nor is it misguided liberalism; it is exactly what it is by design, purpose, and objective. A program advocated by both major political party administrations for the elitist backers are the same. It is the program of a government which has fallen firmly into the hands of evil forces.

Multiculturalism is similar to drugs and both are used as insidious weapons. Both destroy the heart and fabric of a people. All ties to family, community, and one’s people as a whole are destroyed by these two opiates of the human mind. Both are sponsored from the top down by one-world elitists bent upon creating a world order who’s power is such that its subjects posses no potential for resistance.

By its very nature, every emerging police-state seeks to harness both the power of the state and the people to its will. When calls are made for support of cryptic slogans such as war on crime, drugs, terrorism, hate, poverty, etc. what is really meant is “grant power to the state and applaud the rape of your freedom.” In sum: multiculturalism is another program designed to create the subjects of a Police State without national borders.

The anti-thesis of multiculturalism is moral, religious, and cultural solidarity among the people of a nation and having belief in one’s self and the ultimate good of their people. A cohesiveness that produces a national vision, with set boundaries of acceptability and unacceptability in the affairs of a nation, while allowing for the natural differences in men. Multiculturalism as a tool of warfare becomes impotent and rejected in such an environment.

Canada, U.S. and most of Europe are ruled by politicians about whom the best that can be said is that they are men of ill repute, each out to loot the state. One point is clear, in that the American ruling elite of today are far closer in ideological viewpoint to world government ruled by a privileged few than it is to the world of the American Revolution or the Constitutional Convention of 1789. Yet still, the spirit of 1776 lives on in this land. For once again rebellion to tyrants in obedience to God is afoot. Listen closely and in the distance you can hear the ring of liberty’s bell calling gallant sons and noble daughters to her aid. They know no left, nor right, only treason. And they will not fear to answer. Let tyrants tremble. And though the heavens fall, let there be justice.

Indeed liberal thinkers such as Daniel Brandt have written far more eloquently about the deleterious effects of multiculturalism than the present writer. Brandt’s essay Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite is a must read.

White Slaves

By Michael A. Hoffman


When White servitude is acknowledged as having existed in America, it is almost always termed as temporary “indentured servitude” or part of the convict trade, which, after the Revolution of 1776, centered on Australia instead of America. The “convicts” transported to America under the 1723 Waltham Act, perhaps numbered 100,000.

The indentured servants who served a tidy little period of 4 to 7 years polishing the master’s silver and china and then taking their place in colonial high society, were a minuscule fraction of the great unsung hundreds of thousands of White slaves who were worked to death in this country from the early l7th century onward.

Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were White slaves and they were America’s first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too.

Whites were auctioned on the block with children sold and separated from their parents and wives sold and separated from their husbands. Free Black property owners strutted the streets of northern and southern American cities while White slaves were worked to death in the sugar mills of Barbados and Jamaica and the plantations of Virginia.

The Establishment has created the misnomer of “indentured servitude” to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early America called themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called “custom of the country,” as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the White slave merchants themselves.

In George Sandys laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved “forever.” The service of Whites bound to Berkeley’s Hundred was deemed “perpetual.” These accounts have been policed out of the much touted “standard reference works” such as Abbott Emerson Smith’s laughable whitewash, Colonists in Bondage.

I challenge any researcher to study 17th century colonial America, sifting the documents, the jargon and the statutes on both sides of the Atlantic and one will discover that White slavery was a far more extensive operation than Black enslavement. It is when we come to the 18th century that one begins to encounter more “servitude” on the basis of a contract of indenture. But even in that period there was kidnapping of Anglo-Saxons into slavery as well as convict slavery.


Before British slavers traveled to Africa’s western coast to buy Black slaves from African chieftains, they sold their own White working class kindred (”the surplus poor” as they were known) from the streets and towns of England, into slavery. Tens of thousands of these White slaves were kidnapped children. In fact the very origin of the word kidnapped is kid-nabbed, the stealing of White children for enslavement.

According to the English Dictionary of the Underworld, under the heading kidnapper is the following definition: “A stealer of human beings, esp. of children; originally for exportation to the plantations of North America.”

The center of the trade in child-slaves was in the port cities of Britain and Scotland:

“Press gangs in the hire of local merchants roamed the streets, seizing ‘by force such boys as seemed proper subjects for the slave trade.’ Children were driven in flocks through the town and confined for shipment in barns…So flagrant was the practice that people in the countryside about Aberdeen avoided bringing children into the city for fear they might be stolen; and so widespread was the collusion of merchants, shippers, suppliers and even magistrates that the man who exposed it was forced to recant and run out of town.” (Van der Zee, Bound Over, p. 210).

White slaves transported to the colonies suffered a staggering loss of life in the 17th and 18th century. During the voyage to America it was customary to keep the White slaves below deck for the entire nine to twelve week journey. A White slave would be confined to a hole not more than sixteen feet long, chained with 50 other men to a board, with padlocked collars around their necks. The weeks of confinement below deck in the ship’s stifling hold often resulted in outbreaks of contagious disease which would sweep through the “cargo” of White “freight” chained in the bowels of the ship.

Ships carrying White slaves to America often lost half their slaves to death. According to historian Sharon V. Salinger, “Scattered data reveal that the mortality for [White] servants at certain times equaled that for [Black] slaves in the ‘middle passage,’ and during other periods actually exceeded the death rate for [Black] slaves.” Salinger reports a death rate of ten to twenty percent over the entire 18th century for Black slaves on board ships enroute to America compared with a death rate of 25% for White slaves enroute to America.


Independent investigator A.B. Ellis in the Argosy writes concerning the transport of White slaves, “The human cargo, many of whom were still tormented by unhealed wounds, could not all lie down at once without lying on each other. They were never suffered to go on deck. The hatchway was constantly watched by sentinels armed with hangers and blunder busses. In the dungeons below all was darkness, stench, lamentation, disease and death.”

Marcus Jernegan describes the greed of the shipmasters which led to horrendous loss of life for White slaves transported to America:

“The voyage over often repeated the horrors of the famous ‘middle passage’ of slavery fame. An average cargo was three hundred, but the shipmaster, for greater profit, would sometimes crowd as many as six hundred into a small vessel…The mortality under such circumstances was tremendous, sometimes more than half…Mittelberger (an eyewitness) says he saw thirty-two children thrown into the ocean during one voyage.”

“The mercantile firms, as importers of (White) servants, were not too careful about their treatment, as the more important purpose of the transaction was to get ships over to South Carolina which could carry local produce back to Europe. Consequently the Irish –as well as others– suffered greatly…


A study of the middle passage of White slaves was included in a Parliamentary Petition of 1659. It reported that White slaves were locked below deck for two weeks while the slave ship was still in port. Once under way, they were “all the way locked up under decks…amongst horses.” They were chained from their legs to their necks.

Those academics who insist that slavery is an exclusively Black racial condition forget or deliberately omit the fact that the word slave originally was a reference to Whites of East European origin – “Slavs.”

Moreover, in the 18th century in Britain and America, the Industrial Revolution spawned the factory system whose first laborers were miserably oppressed White children as young as 6 years of age. They were locked in the factories for sixteen hours a day and mangled by the primitive machinery. Hands and arms were regularly ripped to pieces. Little girls often had their hair caught in the machinery and were scalped from their foreheads to the back of their necks.

White Children wounded and crippled in the factories were turned out without compensation of any kind and left to die of their injuries. Children late to work or who fell asleep were beaten with iron bars. Lest we imagine these horrors were limited to only the early years of the Industrial Revolution, 8 and 10 year old White children throughout America were hard at work in miserable factories and mines as late as 1920…..[As in the top photo]


Today much of what we see on [television] are TV films depicting Blacks in chains, Blacks being whipped, Blacks oppressed. Nowhere can we find a cinematic chronicle of the Whites who were beaten and killed in White slavery. Four-fifths (80%) of the White slaves sent to Britain’s sugar colonies in the West Indies did not survive their first year.


The chronicle of White slavery in America comprises the dustiest shelf in the darkest corner of suppressed American history. Should the truth about that epoch ever emerge into the public consciousness of Americans, the whole basis for the swindle ofAffirmative action,” “minority set-asides” and proposed “Reparations to African-Americans” will be swept away. The fact is, the White working people of this country owe no one. They are themselves the descendants, as Congressman Wilmot so aptly said, of “the sons of toil.”

Full article here:



Untold Story Of WHITE Slavery

BLACK Slave Owners

Legacy: White Guilt or Pride

Middle East Slavery

U.S. Civil War – NOT A Slave Issue

More Refugees To Support

Our own abandoned CANADIAN ‘refugees’ are allowed to fend for themselves on cold winter streets while refugee policies dictate that Canada must foolishly charter several 747’s to fly-in foreign strangers from around the world…. and then we have the “honour” of paying these uneducated, unskilled 3rd world illiterate people $2470 every month to live with us, in perpetuity. What madness! -Editor- (Read Below)

Caption by Andy DonatoToronto Sun

By Jennifer O’Brien, London (Ontario) Free Press


Nearly 100 refugees from Southeast Asia — 52 of them children — have settled in London (Ontario) since November after living for years in a refugee camp on the Thai border.

[Is the “children” insert supposed to pull at the heart strings and make this story more palatable to those who are able to calculate the enormous tax-co$t factor of this endeavour? -Editor]

The newest Londoners are among 880 Karen (Burma) refugees to come to Canada in recent weeks as part of Citizenship and Immigration’s Government Assisted Refugee Program.

[We could easily round up 880 CANADIAN ‘street refugees’ whose bed tonight will be a damp cardboard box lying on a city grate, or perhaps a thin sleeping bag laying under a bridge. Instead…we pluck the equivalent of a small town of 880 foreign nationals living half-way around the world, air-transport them into Canada, set them up in apartments, feed them, provide medical/dental care and then teach them English, all at working tax-payers expense. -Editor]

“This has been the most wonderful experience,” said Mary Williamson of London’s Cross Cultural Learner Centre, which welcomed and hosted the families and has since helped settle its members in apartments around London (Ontario).

“From the moment the first group arrived, they have been nothing but wonderful, you’ve never seen more appreciative people,” she added, pointing to a colourful fabric — a traditional Karen wrap — given to her as a gift.

[Before Mary becomes too excessive in her display of gushing enthusiasim …and who has conveniently ignored any facts related to costs, along with the reporter…she should read the ‘The Ordeal of Immigration in Wausau’ by Roy Beck located here: Numbersusa.com


In conjunction with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the Canadian government seeks out people living in refugee camps and offers them a new life in Canada.

[The U.N. only operates under the guise of humanitarism because its true function is really ‘globalization’ or one-world-government. -Editor]


Cross Cultural staff have worked around the clock with community members, providing information on everything from transportation to translation to setting up bank accounts, social insurance numbers and health cards.

[”Cross Cultural staff” probably translates into ‘recent REFUGEES themselves’ working for a non-government organization (NGO) whose wages and other expenses are paid by CANADIAN tax-payers working at REAL jobs.

….and the ’setting up bank accounts’ is where all these lucky lotto winners are to receive their overly-generous MONTHLY welfare cheques amounting to $2470 PER SINGLE refugee!! Obviously, newly arrived couples and couples with children receive well over $3000 of FREE INCOME every month -Editor]

Citizenship and Immigration Canada has not received such a large group since 2003, when it welcomed Sudanese and Somalian refugees as a group.

[…..and how many of those Somalian & Sudanese refugees have relinquished their largess for a low paying job? ……now go back to work Canada, because you’re paying for all this foolish generosity. -Editor]

View Roy Beck’s Astonishing Immigration Numbers in this 14 min. VIDEO